Sorry to state the obvious, but you have a choice in this, you simply may not like that choice. It has been gone over multiple times and should now be obvious that the FP+ system is unlikely to be palatable to those whose touring style involved multiple parks/multiple FP-. It is a statement of fact that this NEW system has less capacity for flexibility than the previous system, resulting in the more experienced WDW attendees having to scale back their level of activity.
With this in mind and giving Disney Parks the credit they deserve (ie: they certainly foresaw these complaints from what is a portion of their total customer base) and keeping in mind that Disney STILL intends to proceed with FP+, it seems you are left with a binary choice. Go or don't.
I would also suggest that we cannot know the full impact or evolution of the FP+ system until such a time as legacy fastpass is completely phased out. I believe that the purpose of this new FP+ system is to intentionally limit the "most effective users" of FP-, to distribute the experience to the less knowledgeable users which in my mind is a net positive. I find that the "forecasted" outcomes of the impact of FP+ system on these types of threads are too steeped in bias to have any discernible value.
Now, I don't mind opinions expressed which are contrary to my own, but I DO mind how both sides of this argument seem to be defaulting to strong language/using absolutes. Sorry to glom on to your post specifically Robo, but it was the first post that I read today that stuck out to me as embodying the problem with these "debates" as I see it.
Plus, these "debates" are for the most part occurring in adjacent echo chambers. This has more to do with human nature than any persons failings.
EDIT: God, I use too many "quotations" around "words".