[snip]
Yes, I have some opinions about why this is going the way it is, and I think some polite discourse on the subject is interesting, but I'm mostly asking about what was different rather than why was it different.
[snip]
It shouldn't be impossible to talk about the differences in policies and conditions around the world and the differences in outcomes owing to them ... or not owing to them.
[snip]
That's an interesting pair of sentences to chain together. So what do you think was different about China that let them essentially eradicate new cases within 3 months and nearly end the deaths within 4?
OK, if we are just going to speak of WHAT, I think there are a few possible variables worth examining ...
1. Americans' health in general, or lack thereof. This is where obesity, etc. comes in. It is caused in some part by ...
2. Americans' lack of universal healthcare. The majority of uninsured Americans are afraid to seek medical care at all because of the perceived cost, and generally will not seek care unless they are so sick as to be incapable of going to work. This is one of the two factors I believe are most crucial. The other one is ...
3. Americans' lack of Federally-mandated paid sick leave. This causes sick people who do not have this benefit to go to work even when they know they should not, because they are afraid of docked pay, or worse, losing their jobs completely. It has been a problem for years with flu spreading through workplaces, it isn't new. What has changed is the stakes, because going to work shedding this virus is potentially a lot more deadly to others.
4. American business and governments' obsession with the just-in-time model of logistics. Conventional business wisdom is that it is foolish to pay for anything more than the least amount of warehouse space you can possibly get away with, so any time you get a serious supply chain interruption, shortages happen instantly. When the products in question are medical supplies, shortages lead to fatalities.
5. American notions of the sanctity of personal privacy. This one makes effective contact tracing impossible, even when we try (which we often don't, but that's a political issue again.)
It's also relatively new -- we didn't think this way in 1918. The current way of thinking dates back to the early 1970s, and while it has done much good in many ways, it really can cause a lot of harm when the topic is communicable disease.
FWIW, I don't blame China. China is the country that it is, and the society that it is, with cultural traditions it has had for centuries, and one of those traditions is one of the strictest interpretations of the principle of "caveat emptor" that I have ever seen. American companies that successfully do business in China are fully aware of those traditions. They knew full well what happened with SARS (as did the professional cadre of the US government), and we knew that it could happen again and cause just the kind of morbidity that we've seen, but American business at large chose to ignore that scenario in service to the bottom line. It was a calculated risk, and American businesses (and American governments that depend upon those businesses) mostly lost the bet. (Time to re-examine our tolerance for reckless gambling habits, I think.)
When the US "closed" traffic from China (and later, Italy), the loopholes left open were as wide as the side of a barn. Any American citizen who was there or had been there recently was free to return to the US commercially without quarantine. It was only when we started receiving chartered evacuation flights that quarantine began to be required, and only for those passengers, not the commercial ones who might have come in from other departure points, or via private transport. It was decentralized, outsourced to non-professionals, and just generally sloppy, and the virus waltzed right through that meager cordon with hardly a pause at all.
In a job I held a while back with a very finicky labor-intensive product, we used to often tell customers that, "You can have it done cheaply, or you can have it done right, but you can't have both at the same time." Still one of the truest statements I've ever heard when it comes to complicated jobs. Americans are notoriously susceptible to the seduction of a persuasive personality and the outward trappings of material success, and we often think that the broader picture is much more important than the details. This kind of disaster is what happens when we devalue the work of experts who have put in years to truly understand the details of what they do ... when we denigrate detailed meticulous work of the mind as tedious and boring, when it is actually the infrastructure that supports progress. Ideas are nothing without execution.