I personally am fond of the players who lie and game but are ALSO nice awkward friendly folks. Just brilliant and make great moves. Like Steven who won a few seasons back (I think against Vanessa who I also liked a little bit...no, he wisely cut Vanessa). And Aubry on Survivor. They might lie and work deals but they don't slam doors in people's faces or bang pots or DEMAND your vote (like Snackson). Or use personal attacks or personal info to manipulate. They just outwit and win comps (Aubry actually wasn't bad on Survivor with playing comps). ANd they always remember the social part as to not have too bitter a jury. Though Aubry messed up somewhere cause that jury gave dud (like Analise- non entity, piece of furniture) Michele the win. I think in that case Michele was a cool kid and Aubry was a 'bottom feeder' type. Hmmmm....Jackson should really think about taking Nicole as that jury would never give votes to a 'bottom feeder' over a cool kid. They might, though, be bitter enough to vote Holly who was a cool kid over Jackson.