I continue to be concerned about the parks becoming a smaller fish within a Disney mega media company. As its distance from the core increases there is an increased danger of reduced resource allocation and long-term shepardship. Plus, the potential robbing Peter to pay Paul dynamic, when the bigger fish is not carrying its weight.
Well, the parks would sure become a minnow within MSFT. Park results would make little difference to the MSFT bottom line, so there would be no real need to milk the parks in the name of meeting short-term earnings targets. Plus, a billion dollar capital spending budget would not cause them to break into a sweat. However, there is also the real possibility that the division could just fall into a black hole and operate on auto-pilot.
Anyone have any insight into how MSFT treats (management style) small operating units???
If I were Bill I would look at the risk/reward potential. While the rewards of investing in the parks wont make or break MFST, to me the PR risks of letting them slide is huge. There is already plenty of MFST bashing out there, I sure wouldnt want to add any fuel to the fire for the sake of a few extra billion $. Here, I finally have a product with the potential to make people smile instead of curse. I would ride it for all I could. It just might become that not-for-profit organization wed all love to see.
***
Space42: my sentiments exactly on the hat
Scoop: Ive heard of oversimplification. Surely, the test is not whether everything fits into one category or another, but the quality of the effort on average. If your kid always brought home As, how many Cs does it take before you know somethings changed?