It's comical that you think its "privilege" to sail on a ship that has been available to the public for 9 Years...
You do realize that the vast majority of the world can't even afford one
DCL cruise, right? It's not about how long it has been sailing, its about the fact that some of us are very privileged to sail DCL once, let alone, multiple times. I have had multiple business professionals comment to me that they could never afford a DCL cruise. It's a very privileged position to tell someone to get over it, because they should have already seen it on their last multi-thousand-dollar cruise. The fact that you can't even see that when it's pointed out isn't comical, it's sad. Not everyone has the same advantages in life as you apparently have.
Besides, regardless of whether they could have taken 100 previous cruises, they still aren't getting what they paid for.
If you are THAT concerned about it, move your sailing.
Not everyone can just change vacation plans on short notice. But I don't even have a sailing booked on the Wish right now. I was offering my support for those who are disappointed and agreeing with them that Disney should do something as a goodwill gesture. I can relate, because DCL pulled the same thing on us, canceling Aladdin two weeks before our Fantasy sailing, without even the slightest acknowledgement of why it was a big deal to guests.
Contrary to your diatribe, they are simply not going to worry about a show that has been available in some form or another for the last 20 years.
It's just an opinion. Many of us come here to hear other opinions. You offered a counter opinion based on a privileged view of the world. Apparently the same viewpoint held by DCL execs who are out of touch with how this makes their brand look to those who feel they were sold something they aren't receiving. "Surely they have seen it before! Or should have!" "Let them eat cake!"
These little things add up and change consumer opinion over time. You may disagree, but many of those paying for the product think they are losing an important part of what they paid for. I personally would do more to protect the brand in cases like this one. Like I said before, people will pay more because they expect more. If that changes, that goes away for DCL.
It's totally cool to disagree that this is an event warranting a goodwill gesture; it's your reasoning to get to that conclusion that I take issue with.