It was unrealistic not to expect DVC to do something about resales

What bothers me with the restriction for resale buyers of the Riviera is that they are owners of the Riviera and they will have to compete to stay at their home resort with non-owners from the Legacy 14 DVC resorts. These Riviera resale owners have a small chance of getting into their own resort at the 7 month mark. How do you persuade anyone to buy a resale contract for the Riviera when they know they may not get to use their points some years? Or they have to do split stays at their own resort, by booking 3 nights here and 4 nights another month. I think the restriction would be fine if they had their own booking window at 7 months and the legacy people couldn't book until 6 or even 5 months.

This problem will resolve once the resale owners outnumber direct purchase owners at the Legacy resorts but that will be years away. In the meantime the resale owners at the Riviera will often have problems booking. And may never get to use their points for Food and Wine, Thanksgiving, all of December or early January.

Yep exact. But for 1/2 price I would buy a Riviera resale, just smallish so we can bank and borrow on occasion when we know 8 months (or 11) in advance.

Sort of an every 3 year stay.
 
What bothers me with the restriction for resale buyers of the Riviera is that they are owners of the Riviera and they will have to compete to stay at their home resort with non-owners from the Legacy 14 DVC resorts. These Riviera resale owners have a small chance of getting into their own resort at the 7 month mark. How do you persuade anyone to buy a resale contract for the Riviera when they know they may not get to use their points some years? Or they have to do split stays at their own resort, by booking 3 nights here and 4 nights another month. I think the restriction would be fine if they had their own booking window at 7 months and the legacy people couldn't book until 6 or even 5 months.

This problem will resolve once the resale owners outnumber direct purchase owners at the Legacy resorts but that will be years away. In the meantime the resale owners at the Riviera will often have problems booking. And may never get to use their points for Food and Wine, Thanksgiving, all of December or early January.

I wish I could remember who, but somebody made the point on here that this is already happening at VGC, and it obviously doesn't seem to have hurt resale there. It will be interesting to see what happens with Riviera resale contracts, there is no doubt that they will be worth less than resale L14 resort contracts, but how much less is hard to predict.
 
Riviera resale buyers will still have 11 month advantage at Riviera so I dont think they will be completely locked out (unless they only buy enough points for studios or mini studios). I believe this is exactly what Disney is trying to address....
 
What bothers me with the restriction for resale buyers of the Riviera is that they are owners of the Riviera and they will have to compete to stay at their home resort with non-owners from the Legacy 14 DVC resorts. These Riviera resale owners have a small chance of getting into their own resort at the 7 month mark. How do you persuade anyone to buy a resale contract for the Riviera when they know they may not get to use their points some years? Or they have to do split stays at their own resort, by booking 3 nights here and 4 nights another month. I think the restriction would be fine if they had their own booking window at 7 months and the legacy people couldn't book until 6 or even 5 months.

This problem will resolve once the resale owners outnumber direct purchase owners at the Legacy resorts but that will be years away. In the meantime the resale owners at the Riviera will often have problems booking. And may never get to use their points for Food and Wine, Thanksgiving, all of December or early January.
It likely never will resolve but it might be better once the 2042 resorts fall out. The % of 2042 non qualified resale owners will be VERY small even many years from now and really it will be small or all currently sold out resorts. So most owners will have access. But it's really no different from now in that if you have high demand option you. must reserve well in advance of the 7 month window. Plus we don't know the access will be the same to the new system as those who own inside it anyway.
 
But is it attractive enough? They're telling resale purchasers "You can't book at Riviera or any of the new resorts, but you can still book a stay at any of the other 14 fabulous resorts, each of which still have at least 23 more years to their contracts."

Will disallowing resale owners a chance to use their points at Riviera or Relections be enough of a disincentive over the next 5 years? How many DVC II resorts will it take for potential buyers to pay a larger price in order to have access to those resorts...especially since they know that when they sell, that advantage disappears into the ether? Sure, the uneducated buyer is going to sign on the dotted line to purchase direct. But that's not who DVC is directing this action at. They're targeting the informed buyer, who is aware of the resale market. How many of them are going to be influenced to buy direct as a result of this?
I was only referring to potential resale buyers of Riviera. As a resale buyer you go into that contract knowing full well you are just limited to that resort. DVD is trying to steer those people to buy direct by giving them access to all past,and future resorts. Also anyone who was,an,owner before,1/19/2019 is not affected by not being able to book anywhere. My reference to a dirty water dog cart is not to imply resales are,"dirty" it is just what everyone,from,around here calls the food carts, food trucks are known as roach coaches. And again not agreeing with what DVD is doing , just understanding the reason why they are doing it. Money grab, same as the point chart change only that they may have realized they overstepped the boundaries with the charts, time will tell. I feel long time owers got spoiled with new resorts they could use opening up from time to time and the value of their contacts increasing to the point they could sell them for more that they paid even with almost have the years gone. How many other timeshares can you say that about? If you are going to buy today you just have to do it with both eyes wide open and without any pixie dust.
 
Last edited:
Riviera resale buyers will still have 11 month advantage at Riviera so I dont think they will be completely locked out (unless they only buy enough points for studios or mini studios). I believe this is exactly what Disney is trying to address....

Thanks for clarifying that. At least they can book at the 11 month mark. And the resale owners better book at the 11 month mark because there might not be anything to book at 7 months or later.
 
The big problem with this restriction is that it is going to hurt any direct purchaser of the Riviera who needs or wants to sell. So really, hurting the customers that buy direct from them. This isn't going to hurt resale buyers. A resale buyer is going to be fully aware of the restrictions around booking with Riviera points and is going to be offering prices in line with those restrictions. As has been suggested, if prices are low enough then Disney could ROFR them and turn around and sell them as direct points again. Can and will they ROFR everything?

How many people are willing to buy direct because they know how strong the market is for resales incase they need to get out. Losing potentially 50% of your purchase price right away if you need to sell will certainly stop some people from buying direct.

Will be interesting to see how the rate of direct sales at the Riviera compare to previous resorts (equal or lower is my guess) and what the resale prices settle at (lower than SSR is my guess).
 
The big problem with this restriction is that it is going to hurt any direct purchaser of the Riviera who needs or wants to sell. So really, hurting the customers that buy direct from them. This isn't going to hurt resale buyers. A resale buyer is going to be fully aware of the restrictions around booking with Riviera points and is going to be offering prices in line with those restrictions. As has been suggested, if prices are low enough then Disney could ROFR them and turn around and sell them as direct points again. Can and will they ROFR everything?

How many people are willing to buy direct because they know how strong the market is for resales incase they need to get out. Losing potentially 50% of your purchase price right away if you need to sell will certainly stop some people from buying direct.

Will be interesting to see how the rate of direct sales at the Riviera compare to previous resorts (equal or lower is my guess) and what the resale prices settle at (lower than SSR is my guess).
Yes the direct buyer of the new resorts is gonna get slammed if and when they sell. But most timeshare buyers don’t even give a second thought about what would happen if they had to sell. Why would you worry about selling when you are buying? This is what DVD may be counting on. The salespeople are all over the parks and resorts so they pretty much have a captive audience to tout the values of buying a membership. All you have to do is a search on the internet for other time shares that are for sale and see how cheap they are going for compared to what they paid for them. Some are so worthless that charities will not even accept them. At least the new resorts will have some value, just not like they did before the new rules for future resorts. If the resort is done right, I don’t think they will have any problem selling points, same as other timeshares sell their weeks or points. I for one will not be a direct buyer of Riviera but if I like the place and the price is right I would be a resale buyer knowing that if I have to sell I will not get hosed.
 
I feel long time owers got spoiled with new resorts they could use opening up from time to time and the value of their contacts increasing to the point they could sell them for more that they paid even with almost have the years gone.

Why would you think the long time owners are "spoiled" some of them were the first people to buy into a point based system that really had never been tested and could have completely failed, just like a lot of other timeshares. My folks till this day, would never buy any timeshare, Disney or other developer, because of how many timeshares failed in the 80's and 90's. These owners who were the first to buy in, should be rewarded for their loyalty to the club, I'm sure most original owners have helped sell several hundreds of points for DVC. They should also reap the rewards of the success of the timeshare, just like any other stock holder who held Apple or Amazon from the beginning. If anything DVC should be giving out longevity rewards to people who have held on to their contracts for say over 20 years.

It's only in the last 5-8 years that DVC prices have really taken off, mainly because of the expansion of the internet and forums like this along with the rental and resale brokers, and that DVC ownership has become more of speculative investment than a vacation plan.

Believe me, I'm very envious of the owners who bought in 10 years ago during the recession, but I wasn't in a need or place financially to buy in, like most things in life, timing is everything. But I also don't hold it against them either.
 
Why would you think the long time owners are "spoiled" some of them were the first people to buy into a point based system that really had never been tested and could have completely failed, just like a lot of other timeshares. My folks till this day, would never buy any timeshare, Disney or other developer, because of how many timeshares failed in the 80's and 90's. These owners who were the first to buy in, should be rewarded for their loyalty to the club, I'm sure most original owners have helped sell several hundreds of points for DVC. They should also reap the rewards of the success of the timeshare, just like any other stock holder who held Apple or Amazon from the beginning. If anything DVC should be giving out longevity rewards to people who have held on to their contracts for say over 20 years.

It's only in the last 5-8 years that DVC prices have really taken off, mainly because of the expansion of the internet and forums like this along with the rental and resale brokers, and that DVC ownership has become more of speculative investment than a vacation plan.

Believe me, I'm very envious of the owners who bought in 10 years ago during the recession, but I wasn't in a need or place financially to buy in, like most things in life, timing is everything. But I also don't hold it against them either.
Why would I say that??? You have answered that question in your reply. Buying a timeshare is not an investment, it is a prepaid vacation plan.
 
The big problem with this restriction is that it is going to hurt any direct purchaser of the Riviera who needs or wants to sell. So really, hurting the customers that buy direct from them. This isn't going to hurt resale buyers. A resale buyer is going to be fully aware of the restrictions around booking with Riviera points and is going to be offering prices in line with those restrictions. As has been suggested, if prices are low enough then Disney could ROFR them and turn around and sell them as direct points again. Can and will they ROFR everything?

How many people are willing to buy direct because they know how strong the market is for resales incase they need to get out. Losing potentially 50% of your purchase price right away if you need to sell will certainly stop some people from buying direct.

Will be interesting to see how the rate of direct sales at the Riviera compare to previous resorts (equal or lower is my guess) and what the resale prices settle at (lower than SSR is my guess).
Most aren't going to think about it or if they do, assume it won't affect them. Saying they will be fully educated is a stretch, most aren't as the reallocation discussions have proven.
 
I've already posted what I think the effect of these restrictions are going to be, but basically every owner, direct and resale is going to lose out by having less availability for trading at 7 months and by being forced to book earlier and earlier.

Anyone that has a trading restriction on their points is going to be highly motivated to start walking at their home resort as early as possible just to ensure they have something.

I think there are a lot of Direct buyers who have been so happy with this announcement that are going to be very disappointed that it won't accomplish what they want out of it because it isn't being done for the members but for Disney, DVD and DVC.

They just did make buying direct more attractive starting with Riviera, you can stay at any resort you want if you buy direct. Not saying I like it but it is what it is. And you can eat your whole hotdog, just not inside of my restaurant.

But will those who investigate and have an interest in resale in attempting to get the best value going to suddenly be driven to Rivera? IMO it's not likely. Those who would be sold on it now probably could have been sold on it previously with a better carrot that if they ever needed to sell there was a good resale market.

What bothers me with the restriction for resale buyers of the Riviera is that they are owners of the Riviera and they will have to compete to stay at their home resort with non-owners from the Legacy 14 DVC resorts. These Riviera resale owners have a small chance of getting into their own resort at the 7 month mark. How do you persuade anyone to buy a resale contract for the Riviera when they know they may not get to use their points some years? Or they have to do split stays at their own resort, by booking 3 nights here and 4 nights another month. I think the restriction would be fine if they had their own booking window at 7 months and the legacy people couldn't book until 6 or even 5 months.

This problem will resolve once the resale owners outnumber direct purchase owners at the Legacy resorts but that will be years away. In the meantime the resale owners at the Riviera will often have problems booking. And may never get to use their points for Food and Wine, Thanksgiving, all of December or early January.

As mentioned - they'll have the home priority window unless DVC is really switching it up for Riviera so it's not as bad as you were thinking. I've owned VGC since it went on sale and I don't hold it against other owners who book up that availability at 7 months. It's how the system works. I have the window to book and if I don't have my ducks in a row then the product doesn't really work for me. It's not that it needs to change to work for me. As I mentioned above though I do not think this is a good direction for DVC to take.

The golden age was the mid-90s and those days are long gone.
That was when I was a member of the only Disney Club that I '"loved". The Magic Kingdom Club. Sigh
 
Do you feel the same way about your personal home? You can sell it, but the “resale buyers” can’t use the neighborhood pool and tennis courts, and they can’t attend the public school.

Actually, my fence when I built has a warranty that is good for the "life of the fence" for the original owner only. That means as long as I own it, it's covered. However, when I sell, it's not. That limits their liability to an average of 20 years and a maximum of like 50 or so. It makes sense.

My house came with a contract with the county to maintain some Forrest. Again, this is the life of the original owner. It doesn't pass on to resale.

Limiting benefits to the original owner is nothing new.
 
Actually, my fence when I built has a warranty that is good for the "life of the fence" for the original owner only. That means as long as I own it, it's covered. However, when I sell, it's not. That limits their liability to an average of 20 years and a maximum of like 50 or so. It makes sense.

My house came with a contract with the county to maintain some Forrest. Again, this is the life of the original owner. It doesn't pass on to resale.

Limiting benefits to the original owner is nothing new.

But I didn't have such a restriction when I first bought. It's like if you had a warranty that was transferable and then the fence manufacturer and county came back and told you they changed their mind.
 
But I didn't have such a restriction when I first bought. It's like if you had a warranty that was transferable and then the fence manufacturer and county came back and told you they changed their mind.
In a sense you did in that you had a contract that stated what was contractual and that future resorts might or might not be added. That is all still in place even after Riviera opens assuming it's not added to the current system.
 
In a sense you did in that you had a contract that stated what was contractual and that future resorts might or might not be added. That is all still in place even after Riviera opens assuming it's not added to the current system.

My comment was meant in regards to what happens with selling and resale trades, not about resorts being added or removed.
 
But it's really one and the same. You have not lost any of the options that were contractually guaranteed.
While I agree with you here. My concern is that there will be an imbalance between the new resorts and old resorts at some point. Either there will be more eligible new resorts looking to trade into the old resorts than old resort members who can trade into new resorts. Or there will be more eligible old resorts looking to trade into the new resorts than new resort members who can trade into old resorts. Either way the trading system as it currently stands in about 5 years will be wildly different. Hopefully the new resorts take off and make them worthwhile choices on their own. Thus limiting the impact of this imbalance that will eventually come.

But this just means the home resort priority period will be super important and people will have to grab it then. Thus even making it more difficult to trade at 7 months.
 
While I agree with you here. My concern is that there will be an imbalance between the new resorts and old resorts at some point. Either there will be more eligible new resorts looking to trade into the old resorts than old resort members who can trade into new resorts. Or there will be more eligible old resorts looking to trade into the new resorts than new resort members who can trade into old resorts. Either way the trading system as it currently stands in about 5 years will be wildly different. Hopefully the new resorts take off and make them worthwhile choices on their own. Thus limiting the impact of this imbalance that will eventually come.

But this just means the home resort priority period will be super important and people will have to grab it then. Thus even making it more difficult to trade at 7 months.
True but as the system is set up and is c/w the contractual wording as I read it thus contractually speaking I don't think it matters. I suspect it'll take longer than 5 years and I doubt there will ever be a big issue as the % of those with resale not qualifying will continue to be small but will slowly increase over time. And we don't know the access will be the same between the current system and the new system, it might not be as we're accustomed to. It'd be common to have an offset say 11 month home resort priority, 7 months within the rest of THAT system and 6 months for crossovers. We'll see, should be interesting.

I'm assuming that this will be a new system with a crossover, I have trouble envisioning how they could do so otherwise but we'll see.
 
True but as the system is set up and is c/w the contractual wording as I read it thus contractually speaking I don't think it matters. I suspect it'll take longer than 5 years and I doubt there will ever be a big issue as the % of those with resale not qualifying will continue to be small but will slowly increase over time. And we don't know the access will be the same between the current system and the new system, it might not be as we're accustomed to. It'd be common to have an offset say 11 month home resort priority, 7 months within the rest of THAT system and 6 months for crossovers. We'll see, should be interesting.

I'm assuming that this will be a new system with a crossover, I have trouble envisioning how they could do so otherwise but we'll see.
I'm hoping for some sort of 3rd booking period in the future as a crossover between the resorts. Also this new setup they have starting with Riviera will be interesting to see how it works. Because our Contracts all tie admission to the club (right to change resorts) to our deeds however the new contracts won't be doing that. So there is actually a large change in the contracts that is coming. Personally if Riviera succeeds and each subsequent resort does it won't be a problem. I suspect the biggest one that will be an issue is Reflections as that location isn't that competitive over CCV, BRV, VGF, etc. and has all these restrictions. At least Riviera is a DVC resort with access to DHS and Epcot (might be super easy with the gondolas might not be but I think for sure better than buses).

So the admission of Riviera to the club does change the contract we all signed because our contracts say we shouldn't expect new resorts but it does say if one comes online it would join the club. But the resale restrictions are a bit different because it isn't apart of the deed now.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!













facebook twitter
Top