I do think this is fair. To also be fair, some of the biggest advocates for FP+ advocate it because of its impact during the busier times of the year. They rarely qualify their comments and view points as such. Quite often the conversation around FP+ just assumes medium to high crowds, as if that's the only time people go. So I am not surprised if someone who doesn't particularly like FP+ also speaks about it as if it were a fairly busy time of year, and generalizes as such. I mean how many times have I read: FP+ is great because I was able to go to the parks in the afternoon (or evening) and have my 3 FPs, no WAY was that possible in FP- FP+ is great because at least I know I am getting on 3 rides, no way was that true under FP- unless we were there at the crack of dawn. FP+ is great because I can have 3 rides for the afternoon, use RD, and get way more done than we could have under FP-. Etc etc.... But none of that is true in the lower crowd levels. When we tour, we were able to pull FPs all day, for all the biggest attractions, even TSMM sometimes !!!! like, in the afternoon even ! FP+ does have its advantages, I can see them, but the mostly apply when crowds are higher, IMO. On lower crowd days, over all, I can't see how FP+ is better than FP-. It might suit your touring style, but if you maximized either system, I would wager you would get more done (if that is your goal) under FP-.
