I think this is part of what a pp was referring to when referring to fatherless homes. The days of “Wait till your father gets home” to successfully deter problems weren’t so long ago. I agree that children benefit from perspectives and involvement of both mothers and fathers. But when people try to talk about this, they’re shut down. Oh, and I don’t think the pp was referring just to this case necessarily, but in general.
Hmm, let’s see. Social media and related psychiatric disturbances in children; violent video games; violent movies - for which Hollywood has some ‘splaining to do. Seems if it makes them money, it doesn’t matter much to them. Very hypocritical for them to make violent movies and then speak out about the hazards of guns.
Yes, interesting there were terrorism charges right away here, while just the opposite with the parade killer - no terrorism Maybe someone can explain the differences?
Easy, huh? I wish you’d enlighten us so we can be as informed as you are!