Did you ask Hoda? She seems to knowAlso curious how these tests are handling mutations?
Next time I see her, I'll let you know. I'll be honest, I haven't watched any network morning shows since about 1994, when I last lived at home, because that was the only option in the mornings back then.Did you ask Hoda? She seems to know
I don't know about flu, but people who have had COVID19 are returning positive tests for weeks after symptoms subside. Some for over a month. So it seems unlikely that he waited so long to seek testing or treatment that he's no longer testing positive.
I agree an antibody test would be interesting, but that doesn't change that fact that verifying something *before* reporting it is a fundamental standard of journalism that was deliberately disregarded here for the sake of a "shocking" segment.
To be clear, not a comment directed at you - just the absurdity that she can, through a remote interview, state, "you clearly have it" - like she's some sort of expert.Next time I see her, I'll let you know. I'll be honest, I haven't watched any network morning shows since about 1994, when I last lived at home, because that was the only option in the mornings back then.
Just for the record my dad was asked for permission before intubation. They had also previously asked my permission in the event that he couldn’t give his. I did not watch the interview, did they put him on a Cpap instead? Or just increased oxygen on the cannula? If the latter that does sound off.I was thinking along these lines as well.
Why test people at all if this expert is on television saying tests are 50% inaccurate?
Also weird was he stated the doctors asked him if he wanted to be intubated. He said "No". So they just upped his oxygen and he started to improve. As if the doctors didn't think to do that first? And he was surrounded by intubated patients. But, somehow, his increased oxygen got him out of critical condition.
Did the doctors ask everyone if they wanted to be intubated and they said yes? Is it actually a choice? A discussion? "Hey. Do you want to be intubated? No? Ok. Let's try the less invasive oxygen increase. Well, what do you know! It worked!"
It was just all so weird. I love Hoda. And was so disappointed she said that he clearly had Coronavirus by just looking at a man on oxygen. I never thought she would stoop for ratings.
To be clear, not a comment directed at you - just the absurdity that she can, through a remote interview, state, "you clearly have it" - like she's some sort of expert.
More agregious to me is that our local (LA) NBC affiliate then cherry-picked bits from the interview and spliced together their own news story from that. Biased much?
Also weird was he stated the doctors asked him if he wanted to be intubated. He said "No". So they just upped his oxygen and he started to improve. As if the doctors didn't think to do that first? And he was surrounded by intubated patients. But, somehow, his increased oxygen got him out of critical condition.
Did the doctors ask everyone if they wanted to be intubated and they said yes? Is it actually a choice? A discussion? "Hey. Do you want to be intubated? No? Ok. Let's try the less invasive oxygen increase. Well, what do you know! It worked!"
For the intubation - it is now used a lot less in COVID patients because it doesn't help as much as they thought - and it often does more harm than good. There are articles out there about that. If I got COVID, I would ask not to be intubated. Place me on my stomach and increase the O2 flow through the cannulas.
Also, why would we put so much stock in widespread testing for Covid-19 if this expert was tested 4 times and claims they aren't accurate 50% of the time?
My sister in law tested positive for 35 days when she had it.I don't know about flu, but people who have had COVID19 are returning positive tests for weeks after symptoms subside. Some for over a month. So it seems unlikely that he waited so long to seek testing or treatment that he's no longer testing positive.
I agree an antibody test would be interesting, but that doesn't change that fact that verifying something *before* reporting it is a fundamental standard of journalism that was deliberately disregarded here for the sake of a "shocking" segment.
A 14 yr old boy in a NY hospital was having many of the symptoms of pediatric inflammatory syndrome and his heart & organs were failing. He tested negative for COVID-19. His mother insisted that the doctors test him again, and that's when the second test uncovered the COVID-19. Thus, they were able to give him the right treatment. He's now recovering.
She claimed she couldn't get a test. But then others in her area posted they had no issues being tested. I wondered if she really had coronavirus?Probably the same reason Kathy griffin went on a tirade saying she had coronavirus and blaming the president for it when she actually had some sort of infection. For ratings and to make a political statement.
GO MOM! Mom's just know sometimes and I am glad she insisted on another test.
This all reminded me of Nick Cordero. He had two negative tests and tested positive on the third. But he was hospitalized for a while at that point and I wondered if he eventually contracted coronavirus in the hospital?
They originally said he had pneumonia, which his wife posted that she had pneumonia on Instagram in January. It's difficult to follow the wife's updates because she is really concerned with posting her bare belly and multiple angles of her in a bikini, while talking of the devastation Covid-19 had caused the family. The poor man lost his leg! And the wife is really looking to focus attention on her rockin' bod. I pray for this guy (Nick) every day. I hope he comes out of it.
I read an article that states he tested negative 4 times and he says it's because he waited too long to get tested. I didn't watch the Today show so I don't know what he said the reason was there.
I think it is very disengenuous to go on a National TV show and state that you do have the virus when you have tested negative for it, not just once but multiple times. Also for a host to state "you clearly have it" when without an actual positive result that is not clear at all.
It really makes me questions one's motive for such an act.
How about do some interviews of real people- those on the front line who are fighting to keep confirmed COVID patients alive. or people who have recovered from it to tell their stories.
stop showcasing people who want to have it for your ratings or other reasons.
Did you hear? Yesterday, he finally woke up!!! He's very, very weak. Can only follow eye commands by the doctor to answer yes or no to questions. He has a looooong recovery ahead of him. But, he's finally awake.
This is probably the reason for the negative tests. The shedding occurs early with this virus. If he wasn't admitted and tested until after he was no longer contagious and has a low viral load, it wouldn't show up as positive, right? But the complications can last much longer. I didn't watch the interview, but did he have an antibodies test? X-rays of his lungs?Keep in mind he was home ill a week before he was admitted to the hospital after his breathing became compromised and he realized his lungs were struggling.