Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
The reality is that just doesn't happen because people have to basically really hate the other option. It might have happened in the past none are coming to mind but Romeo was brought to the end strictly because he was seen as someone who couldn't and wouldn't win. For the game of survivor from the beginning what got you to the end has changed, what has won people in the end has changed but it's been pretty much steady that if you're a player who didn't do anything and you got to the end it was because you weren't going to win because nobody felt you should get it.I’d love to see a person who, everyone felt didn’t have any kind of a shot, win.
I was reading interviews from Jonathon and Lindsay where the interviewer said that Romeo really truly thought that the jury believed him on that idol being real, both of them said no one on the jury thought that and they basically rolled their eyes. I had the same reaction like it was just some drama to be dramatic.
I don't think Romeo is an annoying person per se but he is as self unaware as Mike was.
Now I have seen players fight tooth and nail without an alliance and ones who knew they were on the outs but who had ways they could contribute if they were given the chance, ways they could make a good person to partner up with IF people would let them in and ones who stood out like a sore thumb because they kept winning individual immunity when no one wanted them to. That was not Romeo. Romeo's got a great story for himself, something that appears to have been cathartic to him, but not something that was relating to the actual game and actual reason he should have won or gotten votes.