ROTR Boarding group issues resolution thoughts

This is largely a devil's advocate argument for me because I don't personally see first come-first serve as unfair, but it's clear from discussion in the other thread that there are people who do. And do do you really think everyone accepts that as more fair than a pure lottery? I think there are many people who think random chance is more fair.

I'm content with the BG process as is and think it's certainly "fair enough." It seems to be a compromise between first-come and chance, whether or not that's not what Disney had intended with it.

As you mention, my concerns about straight standby lines are more about the public safety/civility and logistical impact on the rest of the guests. I woudn't complain about it being unfair, but apparently others would.
Oh, I’m not necessarily talking about standby... just saying the BGs would be given out 1st come, 1st served. I doubt too many people would find that “unfair,” if it was possible. They might not like it, but that’s a different issue...
 
Oh, I’m not necessarily talking about standby... just saying the BGs would be given out 1st come, 1st served. I doubt too many people would find that “unfair,” if it was possible. They might not like it, but that’s a different issue...

Ah, I agree. I guess I was interpreting the suggestion as just throwing it over to 100% standby.
 
This is largely a devil's advocate argument for me because I don't personally see first come-first serve as unfair, but it's clear from discussion in the other thread that there are people who do. And do do you really think everyone accepts that as more fair than a pure lottery? I think there are many people who think random chance is more fair.

I'm content with the BG process as is and think it's certainly "fair enough." It seems to be a compromise between first-come and chance, whether or not that's not what Disney had intended with it.

As you mention, my concerns about straight standby lines are more about the public safety/civility and logistical impact on the rest of the guests. I woudn't complain about it being unfair, but apparently others would.

I agree to a point. We all have control over the first come, first serve part, but not everyone can play the BG game of CHANCE.

You first have to qualify (you need to be tech savvy, have a decently fast phone, and access to a data plan). And this is after stressing out weeks in advance and obsessively reading through 3000 DISboards thread messages to make sure you don't miss a magic tip to help you be competitive in that game of CHANCE.

I'm from Canada, and don't have a data roaming plan. So I'm going to have to change my plan, pay extra cash just for the CHANCE to WIN. Will my 2 year old phone be fast enough? Will data roaming slow me down so much that ONE MINUTE window I have won't be enough time?

In a REAL game of chance - everyone qualifies... it's simply submitting your name/ ticket# and crossing your fingers.

This BG allotment system is too heavily reliant on phone technology and data plans. And I'd foster a guess the older visitors, or those that maybe can't afford that current technology/data, could find it discriminatory. Yeah, yeah, I know - that's a bit of a stretch, but they really are excluding a specific portion of the SW fanbase.
 
One idea might be to allocate half of the ride capacity to BGs using the current system and then have the remaining capacity as standby. Disney can then close the standby line once it is no longer contained within the designed queue. This standby closure idea wouldn't really be much different than when the parks have phased closures for certain high volume holidays as a way of managing capacity.
 
I hope you don't mind me quoting you here from the other thread--I wanted to move my thoughts to this thread.

That is totally fine, I agree it's better to keep all of this out of the boarding group info thread.

I think "The only system that is actually FAIR" gets at the heart of this. There simply is not an objective definition of what's fair in a case like this.

To me there is - a system that is fair, is one that has rules that if you obey you can get a predictable result from, and that I cannot gain an unfair advantage over other people with.

In a fair system, anyone with a stronger desire to ride and who also puts forth some effort, can be assured being able to ride. In a first-come-first-served system, someone who is on a once in a lifetime trip to Disney could be sure to ride ROTR by getting there around two hours before park open, maybe a bit more, and they would know they had a boarding pass.

The reason I can say for sure the current system is not fair at all, is because any small technical slip up means you have no assured boarding group, and maybe even if all is well you have no boarding group simply because there are so many people in the park trying.

You think that system is "actually fair" but not everyone agrees. There are many people who think the first-come, first-serve system is not fair since they can't show up early to get in line, or can't stand in a line all day, or whatever.

I think it's pretty hypothetical to say that there is anyone who truly cannot get there early. Only one person needs to actually be in line to hold a position, for those that truly cannot wait in line that long, they can hang to the side and join just as they are letting people in.

And plenty of people think BGs aren't fair because they don't want to be at the mercy of their cell phone connectivity.

You are not, there is Disney WiFi and also the hard boarding pass distribution. WDW has a better system there because they have cast members with iPads that can get people into boarding groups, so they can be more spread around and more of them than DisneyLand has. At this point people that truly have that issue will be a pretty small percentage though.

And others think a pure lottery is unfair because it's purely random with no chance to get an advantage by doing something that makes you more worthy that the other people who just wandered in and entered the drawing.

Nothing random can be considered "fair", because it is dispropornate to need and effort. I do not consider any system that can casually discard someone who is truly there on a once in a lifetime trip to be "fair".

Still others may think the "actually fair" system would be an open auction where the people willing to pay the most get the boarding groups.

Also not fair for the same reason, and not everyone would have enough money to "win" at that system if they had a need to.
The current system is kind of like this, in that with more money you have a better chance.

My point: your perception that "first come, first serve" is "actually FAIR" is not a belief held by everyone. And that's why we keep going around and around on these ideas--they all have their pros and cons, their supporters and detractors.

It is my opinion but I also have not seen any logic that refutes it. Part of what makes a potential system fair to me is that it does not advantage me, it advantages someone who has a more pressing need or desire to get in than I do. Or to put it another way, what I consider a fair system is one where I cannot give myself an unfair advantage, which I can under the current system, First-Come-First-Served is the only system I have seen I cannot actually rig to my advantage in some way.

P.S. You could almost argue that the currently system is somewhat first-come-first-served at Disneyland, because first people at the hard boarding group distro sites will get a boarding group. But it's not the same as first come first served into the park getting boarding groups, because the hard distribution points are only available to very fast sprinters, and you have to scan one pass at a time in a group. First come first served into the park is way more friendly because you have some time to get your phone working properly, since boarding group distribution speed is limited by the entry rate into the park, another reason that is a fair system.

P.P.S. First come first served actually worked really, really well for the only three days Disney had it in place - opening day and the two days after at WDW. I was there at 3:30am each day, far smaller crowds than at Disneyland on opening day at 2:30am - an argument supposedly in favor of the current system is that people will not get there so early. Yet they still are, and it was worse at Disneyland when everyone knew boarding groups would not be distributed on entry. People did not show up earlier and earlier at Disney World even when it mattered, there is simply a hard cap on how early 90% of people are willing to show up to wait for something. That is what would keep first-come-first-served reasonable. Now that I have ridden the ride a number of times under both systems, I am more sure than ever of what is fair, and what is not.
 
Will my 2 year old phone be fast enough?

Something you may find heartening is that both Friday and Saturday it was my oldest phone (iPhone 7) that beat out my very new other phones in our group. If your family has phones at least have them join park WiFi and try also. The more phones trying the better (but not so many you get too distracted!!!).
 
One idea might be to allocate half of the ride capacity to BGs using the current system and then have the remaining capacity as standby. Disney can then close the standby line once it is no longer contained within the designed queue. This standby closure idea wouldn't really be much different than when the parks have phased closures for certain high volume holidays as a way of managing capacity.
One of the main advantages that the boarding group system has over ANY kind of standby line, regardless of how many people they allow in it, when it would be opened, the capability of closing it, etc., is that the boarding group system eliminates the temptation for guests to arrive extremely early in the morning to try and get a good spot in line, or, if standby were opened later in the day, crowding around ROTR hoping to be "first" when (if) it opens.

Disney does not want people coming at 4 am, or 2 am. They do not want large, immobile crowds forming within WGE or blocking up the entrances. And until the demand for this ride dies waaaaay down, that's exactly what they would get. Online reservations or something like that would also eliminate the early/hopeful queuing problem, but there are other issues it would create.
 
Do you think THIS would be a fair solution, or do you think it would make rope drop even more of a gong show:

Visitors buy their tickets. When they "activate" their ticket, they answer a question: Would you like to request a ROTR BG? Those who select YES, are flagged.

Once everyone scans into the park, they are AUTOMATICALLY assigned a boarding group (same BG for linked tickets) until all available BGs are allocated.

This solution makes BG assignment truly first come, first served. Assignment of a boarding group would "unflag" each ticket holder (APs would have to wait 1 month to "flag" again).

Single day ticket holders would get an automatic flag, so theoretically they could be repeat riders, but they'd have to spend an excessive amount of money on single day tickets. So technically, you're not excluding anyone who can't afford a certain type of ticket, but you're allowing loophole for repeat rides for those crazy fans that are willing to fork over the cash.

I'm sure my idea is flawed in some way, but I'm trying to think of solutions that would allow those without a phone or the non-tech savvy person to play the game.

This is about as close as first come first served you can get without waiting in a 3 hour ride line.

It still doesn't solve the problem for people that can't arrive prior to rope drop...
 
Last edited:
One of the main advantages that the boarding group system has over ANY kind of standby line, regardless of how many people they allow in it, when it would be opened, the capability of closing it, etc., is that the boarding group system eliminates the temptation for guests to arrive extremely early in the morning to try and get a good spot in line, or, if standby were opened later in the day, crowding around ROTR hoping to be "first" when (if) it opens.

Disney does not want people coming at 4 am, or 2 am. They do not want large, immobile crowds forming within WGE or blocking up the entrances. And until the demand for this ride dies waaaaay down, that's exactly what they would get. Online reservations or something like that would also eliminate the early/hopeful queuing problem, but there are other issues it would create.

Considering today's crowd situation resulted in tons of super early risers/ people in the rope drop line getting shut out of a BG, I don't see ANY difference between the current BG system and the situation you describe above.

People are going to start arriving earlier and earlier once they realize it's their only shot at attempting to get a secured BG.
 
Considering today's crowd situation resulted in tons of super early risers/ people in the rope drop line getting shut out of a BG, I don't see ANY difference between the current BG system and the situation you describe above.

People are going to start arriving earlier and earlier once they realize it's their only shot at attempting to get a secured BG.
I don’t think that’s really true. The people who got there by 6 or 6:30 all got in. Parking doesn’t open until 6:30. They aren’t going to have people routinely showing up at 3am or anything.

A bigger issue with standby is clearing the line for breakdowns. I view BGs primarily as a way to moderate the crowd flow due to how unpredictable the ride is.
 
I agree to a point. We all have control over the first come, first serve part, but not everyone can play the BG game of CHANCE.

You first have to qualify (you need to be tech savvy, have a decently fast phone, and access to a data plan). And this is after stressing out weeks in advance and obsessively reading through 3000 DISboards thread messages to make sure you don't miss a magic tip to help you be competitive in that game of CHANCE.

I'm from Canada, and don't have a data roaming plan. So I'm going to have to change my plan, pay extra cash just for the CHANCE to WIN. Will my 2 year old phone be fast enough? Will data roaming slow me down so much that ONE MINUTE window I have won't be enough time?

In a REAL game of chance - everyone qualifies... it's simply submitting your name/ ticket# and crossing your fingers.

This BG allotment system is too heavily reliant on phone technology and data plans. And I'd foster a guess the older visitors, or those that maybe can't afford that current technology/data, could find it discriminatory. Yeah, yeah, I know - that's a bit of a stretch, but they really are excluding a specific portion of the SW fanbase.

It's not discriminatory. There ARE options to get a boarding group that do not require use of a cell phone.
 
...
Single day ticket holders would get an automatic flag, so theoretically they could be repeat riders, but they'd have to spend an excessive amount of money on single day tickets.
....

Although I personally would find this advantageous, I think there are a lot of people who would take exception to a plan that so directly converted money into boarding groups.

Disney is already expensive, so why not throw $500 more on the trip to make sure you are on the ride a few times.

Especially around Los Angeles, any plan that can be worked around with "an excessive amount of money" will be, in large numbers...
 
I don’t think that’s really true. The people who got there by 6 or 6:30 all got in. Parking doesn’t open until 6:30. They aren’t going to have people routinely showing up at 3am or anything.

A bigger issue with standby is clearing the line for breakdowns. I view BGs primarily as a way to moderate the crowd flow due to how unpredictable the ride is.

The people that got there at 6 or 6:30 all got a BP because they got there early AND because they had cell phones. Can someone show up that early without a cell phone and be guaranteed a BG?
 
I agree to a point. We all have control over the first come, first serve part, but not everyone can play the BG game of CHANCE.

You first have to qualify (you need to be tech savvy, have a decently fast phone, and access to a data plan). And this is after stressing out weeks in advance and obsessively reading through 3000 DISboards thread messages to make sure you don't miss a magic tip to help you be competitive in that game of CHANCE.

I'm from Canada, and don't have a data roaming plan. So I'm going to have to change my plan, pay extra cash just for the CHANCE to WIN. Will my 2 year old phone be fast enough? Will data roaming slow me down so much that ONE MINUTE window I have won't be enough time?

In a REAL game of chance - everyone qualifies... it's simply submitting your name/ ticket# and crossing your fingers.

This BG allotment system is too heavily reliant on phone technology and data plans. And I'd foster a guess the older visitors, or those that maybe can't afford that current technology/data, could find it discriminatory. Yeah, yeah, I know - that's a bit of a stretch, but they really are excluding a specific portion of the SW fanbase.
We buy Roam mobility sim cards. 4.95 a day for talk text & data. T mobile. We use it every trip for the Disney app. We will have 4 phones. One on Telus, one on Roam and two on wifi. If we get a bg great...if not...we are still at DL.
 
Although I personally would find this advantageous, I think there are a lot of people who would take exception to a plan that so directly converted money into boarding groups.

Disney is already expensive, so why not throw $500 more on the trip to make sure you are on the ride a few times.

Especially around Los Angeles, any plan that can be worked around with "an excessive amount of money" will be, in large numbers...

So, if that's the case, multiple single-day / multi-day ticket holders would be lumped into the AP group, where a single ride per time period, per person would apply. That would require more sophisticated programming to detect guests with multiple tickets during a time period, but it's totally doable.

The intent with this idea is to auto-generate the BG for interested, first time riders (or riders that haven't ridden in 30+ days) upon entry scan... then it's truly a first-come, first served system - and prioritizing new riders.
 
We buy Roam mobility sim cards. 4.95 a day for talk text & data. T mobile. We use it every trip for the Disney app. We will have 4 phones. One on Telus, one on Roam and two on wifi. If we get a bg great...if not...we are still at DL.

This is a great suggestion! I'd have to unlock my phone first. And then buy the $9.95 sim card. And then pay $4.95 per day. And then add the 30%+ exchange rate...ugh. But still, could still be cheaper than switching my plan, so I'll check it out - thanks!!!

When are you going? I'd love to hear if your T-mobile USA Travel Sim Card and daily plan was the BG Winner!!! 🙂
 
You can pull a boarding group from the FP machines at Buzz and Splash Mountain. Because they’re going so fast, you have to be one of the first people at the machines, but it’s an option.

But it's not really an option if they're all gone in ONE MINUTE by the people with cell phones. That's my point.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top