WillJenDisney
Addicts
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
I find this very confusing. If 2 significant hurricanes in a month prove something related to climate change, then how do 10 years of no significant hurricanes not prove the opposite? We ignore 10 years of nothing, but then draw dramatic conclusions after a single month of hurricanes. I'm not even denying climate change, I just find it absurd that a single month of terrible weather events is supposed to "prove" something, while more than a decade of nothing didn't prove anything.