Muushka
<font color=red>I usually feel like I just stepped
- Joined
- Aug 16, 1999
This is such a tricky subject. I don't think blood banks should make that much money. Lots of people I know think that more people would donate if they were payed (I think they would as well) but a lot of the "wrong" people would donate just for some quick cash. "Wrong" people being for example druggies that have diseases. I do donate, and have received blood before. I guess I should say I donate now because I've had to have one and know the importance. Either way if you are paid or not good for you you really do help.
Yes, I agree, it is a double edged sword. But I would not want to see donors paid to donate.
It is so costly to process blood and then to have to throw the unit away because of problems with it.
But at the same time, if people knew how much money these organizations made (Red Cross comes to mind), they would be less willing to donate. I will not give the Red Cross one drop of blood and certainly no money. I donate my blood to a local hospital that processes and distributes it. And I used to donate blood to the place I worked. While I knew our CEO made a tidy salary, it was still better to donate my blood and know it was needed and would be used (I am type O) rather than not donate at all.
That's another point. When I find a cause to donate to, I always look at the salary of the CEO or whomever is in charge. And the % of the money that goes to administrative costs and actual charity.