Originally posted by LisaR
However, as for your comment about this effecting availability, I can not see why there should be concern. First of all, many people who were driving to WDW will still go.
I was referring to the people who would NOT still go, and the points associated with those "cancellations."
DVC and WDW seem to be doing exactly what the airlines are doing.
Uh, DVC and WDW are two COMPLETELY different animals. WDW is a commercial enterprise, with full discretion to do whatever they feel is appropriate to achieve their overriding goal, even if that means changing their pricing structures and polices and terms and conditions. DVC is a real estate timeshare, which is constrained by law to operate within certain parameters no matter what. That's why I was asking the questions I was asking.
They are allowing you to cancel and reschedule over the next year.
So, assuming you're right in what you wrote there, they're allowing people to extend the validity of points beyond the expiration date of those points. Again, while I agree that that is exactly the right thing to do, I wonder based on what tenet of the legal requirements are they permitted to do that. I could imagine that DV
D is actually covering the "cost" of this gesture -- that would surely be permitted without any legal action whatsoever, and if so, I think DV
D should be lauded for their remarkably gesture of good will to folks who they really have no such obligation to.
I do not think 4 days of cancellations are going to have any impact on DVC availability especially since not everyone cancelled.
That could also be the case, but, as I said earlier, it begs the question: How many "extra points" are there in the system? I thought that there were just as many points available each year as were sold. So the only "slack" would be abandoned points (which is yet-another potential source for covering this gesture, perhaps?)