According to what's been recorded with Orange County, he has mortgages $201K for DVC. He may have paid some of the mortgages off by now so that amount may be less. I didn't do a deep dive.
I could be wrong, but when I read his original statement there was nothing about being drugged. That’s important because it makes it criminal. The first time I remember seeing that was here on these boards. Not sure why something so critical would have been left out previously, if that’s the case. Maybe I missed it.
I see that some newer voices are being added to the conversation which means more people are finding out what’s happened. They start off with the same disbelief in the podcast team until they get to the point in the conversation where they see Dustin’s comments about the team not knowing and to respectfully leave them out of it. Rinse and repeat. I just saw a post yesterday where someone was a user of these boards for 14 years and hadn’t heard of the podcast nor knew who any of the panel is. Some of them never even knew who owned the boards or what his name was.
No one knows. We can speculate but unless someone from the team comes forward we will never know.
Then someone copied it from the other site because it is/was here
There are people commenting on Instagram “whatever is going on John, Kevin, and Pete, you guys will get through it!”
He just learned this week that he had been drugged years ago? I’m sorry …not to be insensitive, but how does that happen exactly?
He mentioned getting a HELOC for a contract as well. The Amex bill might've been used to pay dues (shouldn't be that much as even if he paid them monthly, it was at most less then the six months of dues as dues are due at the beginning of the year and can be paid monthly. Unless he put his direct points on it (last riviera puts was maybe July?) and just never made a payment towards it? I don't believe you can pay resale with credit card.
We need to be careful about keeping these ideas separate. It appears that DIS Management and certain Webmasters are going to the mat with the idea that since Dustin didn't tell anyone about being assaulted, then no one else knew. The two concepts are independent of one another. Dustin does not know what he does not know. His statement that "I never told anyone" has to be read as "I never told anyone. But it is possible that they found out by other means. I just don't know." Charles has revelaed that Pete blabbed about what he did. JL said that she was reaching a conclusion from personal observation. Dustin didn't know about any of this. All that said, Charles says that he never told a soul until yesterday and JL never elevated her suspicions. (No fault there. That's an impossible position to be in unless you are 100% certain.) So if all that is true, then it is certainly possible that no one else on the team (except Charles) knew. The missing pieces of the puzzle are: Did Pete tell anyone besides Charles; and Did anyone else figure out what was going on based on personal observations. So far no one else has come forward to say so, and it isn't our place to assume that any such person or people are out there. Based on that, I am not going to leap to the conclusion that "the entire team knew", nor am I going to conslude that "anyone on the team knew." But the proclamation that no one else knew because Dustin never told anyone else is simply a logical fallacy. That is not the only means of landing on the information.
I'm not proclaiming that no one else knew because Dustin said he never told anyone. As I said in one of my later posts. My point was centering Dustin's wishes which were clearly to lay off that line hypothesis without fact. The inportant part being without fact. Charles, JL have added facts. There are still many unknown.
I hope Pete knows that karma is a b!tch.The money thing was confirmed by Sean on the other site a long time ago and he said it in passing and that it was not meant in a threatening way. This gives more credence to Tyler and Sean are saying the same thing but from two different perspectives. Together with Charles account of enablers, again yet another perspective this time with active beef with Sean to say the least. We have three different perspectives at 3 different posting time points (one from months ago) from 3 different people, 2 that seems to hate each other, Sean saying he kept his distance as best he could from the rest of the staff, I cannot just ignore that as simple coincidence, separate incidents, one off occurrences, or misinterpretations.
And I want to be clear that NONE of my posts should be read in any way as saying there should not be accountability.
must be.
