FlightlessDuck
Y kant Donald fly?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
So why drag it up again?
To make a point.
So why drag it up again?
It is now December 2nd.
116 pages of this thread of hemming and hawing. People worried about a pandemic hitting the US.
0 cases as of right now. ZERO cases. There were only ever two people infected in the United States. TWO.
That woman put into quarantine in NJ and then went back home to Maine? Not infected.
Indeed.
Science, not hysteria, wins in the end.
As did Kaci Hickox, and not the governors.
Got to love science.
While people can now rewrite history, the level of concern about EBOLA in the US a month ago was simply ridiculous.
Those of us who weren't obsessed about the "dangers" were told we were putting our heads in the sand.
I never felt like there was ANY serious risk to the general population. And, still don't.
It was contained. And, now it's over. Just as the CDC said from the very beginning...if people actually listened to what was being said.
I do not feel it is over.
Procedures are now in place. Do you think they stopped screening at airports?
Our servicemen are still building hospitals, clinics. I think they asked reporters to stop reporting, to get the hysteria to die down, guess what, it worked. I am going to be sarcastic here, but Miley Cyrus is dating Patrick Schwartzenegger and another Kardashian posed naked for a magazine. That is what is making the Headline News.
I do not feel it is over.
Procedures are now in place. Do you think they stopped screening at airports?
Our servicemen are still building hospitals, clinics. I think they asked reporters to stop reporting, to get the hysteria to die down, guess what, it worked. I am going to be sarcastic here, but Miley Cyrus is dating Patrick Schwartzenegger and another Kardashian posed naked for a magazine. That is what is making the Headline News.
Got to love science.
While people can now rewrite history, the level of concern about EBOLA in the US a month ago was simply ridiculous.
Those of us who weren't obsessed about the "dangers" were told we were putting our heads in the sand.
I never felt like there was ANY serious risk to the general population. And, still don't.
It was contained. And, now it's over. Just as the CDC said from the very beginning...if people actually listened to what was being said.
It isn't over, unless Ebola has been eradicated, which if it has, I haven't heard.
I think saying "science wins out" is vastly over simplifying what happened, and is actually a pretty dangerous attitude.
When you are dealing with communicable diseases, you are dealing with science AND human factors. You absolutely can't ignore the science but you also can't ignore human nature and the reality of how procedures may or may not be implemented.
Fortunately, it seemed that we learned pretty quickly, and hopefully those lessons stick:
1. Local hospitals aren't - and shouldn't be expected to be - the right location for treating something like ebola. The only place where it was transferred in the US is in a local, unprepared hospital. Joe-schmoe-community-hospital isn't expected to treat highly complicated or unusual cases. They will ship micro-premies to regional centers more highly trained. They will ship advanced or complicated cancer patients to specialty centers. Clearly, once detected, ebola patients should be treated in the handful of specialty centers across the country.
2. We can't trust people to maintain voluntary quarantine on their own. Perhaps in the case of ebola it's not that critical, but it's clear that in more easily spread diseases (say an outbreak of TB or the plague), we need some procedures in place to make sure those who may have been exposed actually limit contact as appropriate.
3. Many medical professionals don't feel prepared to deal with unusual diseases or mass outbreaks. This ties back to #1, but it seems we need some better training to delineate responsibility. In the case of ebola, all hospitals around the country need the ability to detect it and to maintain a quick and immediate quarantine - this clearly requires some additional training. But no, they shouldn't be expected to treat it.
Well thankfully you won't have to deal with it if it appears one day in your workplace. I can't say the same.It's a non-issue in the US. Since I don't travel to West Africa (as I suspect is true of 99+% of Americans), it's over for me. It was NEVER a major issue in the US, except for the media frenzy. That was a big deal. The disease itself? Not so much.
Depends who you talk too. Someone who works a major healthcare facility has the potential to care for someone with Ebola.It's a non-issue in the US. Since I don't travel to West Africa (as I suspect is true of 99+% of Americans), it's over for me. It was NEVER a major issue in the US, except for the media frenzy. That was a big deal. The disease itself? Not so much.
Well thankfully you won't have to deal with it if it appears one day in your workplace. I can't say the same.
Depends who you talk too. Someone who works a major healthcare facility has the potential to care for someone with Ebola.
I read somewhere that there was a case a few weeks ago but it was kept quiet.
My interest in Ebola is primarily from the perspective of a health care worker who may have to care for patients with the disease. I'm game, but I want to see that I'm going to be given the proper equipment and support to do so.
And it looks like Boston may be up next.
Suspected Ebola Patient Being Treated at Boston's Mass General Hospital