Christine
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 31, 1999
But I'm assuming it was someone "in power" at Mickey's who took the information from whoever put two and two together and decided to bring it up to the bank.
OP is upset because she might get in trouble for posting her beliefs (which she had the right to do).
But, Mickey's got "in trouble" (with the OP) for posting their beliefs.
IMO, if one is "right", they're both "right". If one is "wrong", then both are "wrong".
If the OP felt she didn't want her money going to Mickey's, no one can force her to do so. Where the issue came in was the fact that she posted about it.
Well, we're all kind of told to express our negative or positive feedback with merchants. People do it all the time. I don't think anyone should be reprimanded because they expressed disappointment in a merchant's non-compliance with health measures. Her comment was respectful and let's the merchant know that their practices may turn off customers. They can do with that what they will. Why the other person felt the need to go to her employer and complain about her is beyond me. It's not as if the OP was posting under the bank's Facebook account. Overall, I think the Mickey's complaining client was out of line, not the OP. Merchants put their Facebook and other social media up to reach customers and to get feedback.