Point is, she doesn't really seem to care too much about her public/other people. It's rather an established pattern of behavior at this point.
I think that bothers me the most actually....
Point is, she doesn't really seem to care too much about her public/other people. It's rather an established pattern of behavior at this point.
Has anyone read Paula Deen's book, It Ain't All About the Cookin'? I read a few chapters and had to stop because it made me angry. In 1957 her family had a black woman who worked for the them and the woman had a little girl. This little girl had blisters on her hands and Paula had a strong urge to break them. In the book, Paula said she took some kind of bat and hit the little girl with it to break her blisters. The mother of the little girl, who was babysitting Paula at the time, spanked her. Paula went crying to her grandfather and he had the woman arrested and she went to jail.
Black on white hate crime isn't really a thing. There is no history of it in this country.
If you believe this please google Christian Newsom murders. The brutality inflicted on these white college students came from a great well of hatred. They are the worst murders I have ever heard about. It is widely believed here that the national media avoided this case because it is politically incorrect to talk about black hate crimes toward whites.
If these monsters did not act out of hatred I don't know what would cause this type of brutality.
There might have been outrage there but around here it was barely even mentioned. The big double standard is more about how things are covered in the press. There are a lot of double standards in the press for sure but the way race is addressed is one of them.
Look at how the statement Karen Lewis made was covered. Sure, it made the news for a second but if the role was reversed and some white lady in the same or an equivalent position decided to blame black people for all the problems in a white school district there would be much more outrage and completely different coverage.
You will see crimes committed by white people against black people labeled as hate crimes when the reverse isn't done in nearly the same proportion. This is even the case when it was a crime of opportunity and there is no evidence what so ever that the race of either person had anything to do with their target.
Like I said, it is what it is but so many people ignore that it is happening. Part of the problem is that people in this country can't have a logical discussion about race without being labeled a racist. That is totally absurd.
I've thought she was a horrible person since the "I've got Diabetes and here's what you should take for it" debacle. She's older and from Georgia, of course she's likely to spout out racial slurs - possibly without even thinking she's a racist.
Point is, she doesn't really seem to care too much about her public/other people. It's rather an established pattern of behavior at this point.
Has anyone read Paula Deen's book, It Ain't All About the Cookin'? I read a few chapters and had to stop because it made me angry. In 1957 her family had a black woman who worked for the them and the woman had a little girl. This little girl had blisters on her hands and Paula had a strong urge to break them. In the book, Paula said she took some kind of bat and hit the little girl with it to break her blisters. The mother of the little girl, who was babysitting Paula at the time, spanked her. Paula went crying to her grandfather and he had the woman arrested and she went to jail.
If you believe this please google Christian Newsom murders. The brutality inflicted on these white college students came from a great well of hatred. They are the worst murders I have ever heard about. It is widely believed here that the national media avoided this case because it is politically incorrect to talk about black hate crimes toward whites.
If these monsters did not act out of hatred I don't know what would cause this type of brutality.
No offense, but one example in a 300 year history? Are you kidding?
No offense, but one example in a 300 year history? Are you kidding?
Oh, you beat me to it!!
Are you serious? You think this is the only case? If this one was avoided, I'm sure there are more.
What did it say after that story? Did she say she felt smug that she had that lady put in jail? Or did she say she was ashamed at those actions or surprised granddaddy could actually have that much power to have someone who spanked her thrown in jail? I'd really like to know what her next thought was because that'd make a difference in what I thought of her, I'm sure.
She wasn't sorry right after she did it though. She said, "It was pretty satisfying."All this time it's bothered me.
It was me who deserved to be sittin' in that jail for breaking a little black girl's blisters in 1957.
It was alleged in a lawsuit against Deen that "In the presence of Ms. Jackson and Uncle Bubba's restaurant manager and a vendor, Bubba Hiers stated they should send President Obama to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico so he could n***er-rig it."
According to the court documents, the plaintiff stated that she was appointed by Deen to handle the catering and staff for Bubba's wedding in 2007, and she asked Deen what the servers should wear; "Well what I would really like is a bunch of little n***ers to wear long-sleeve white shirts, black shorts and black bow ties, you know in the Shirley Temple days, they used to tap dance around," the plaintiff alleged Deen told her. "Now, that would be a true Southern wedding wouldn't it? But we can't do that because the media would be on me about that."
In the case Lisa Jackson has brought against Deen, Deen stated in her deposition that she has used the "N Word" at times, saying "Yes, of course" she did, and also acknowledged making racist jokes, though she claims she is not racist. "It's just what they are—they're jokes ... most jokes are about Jewish people, rednecks, black folks. ... I can't determine what offends another person.
For your information to all black people it is not FINE. It is used, I'm told, in the hip hop world like the negative word for a female is because, guess what, it's for SHOCK. And that word is NOT acceptable, either, by decent people. Just because "hip hop" crossed over with it and made ignoramuses millionaires does not make it acceptable behavior.
I'm sure no one dragged your daddy out of bed and called him a honky or a redneck and made laws to make him part of a person. I'm sure that never happened to your daddy. But hey, it's just a WORD.
Sorry, no. There are absolutely degrees to which one can perceive racism, but there is very little about calling someone a "n****r" that's not racist.
Black on white hate crime isn't really a thing. There is no history of it in this country.
I'm not ignoring the fact that it exists. I'm saying if you look at the history of this country, hate crimes against Black people outpace hate crimes against White people to an unbelievable amount.
In the book she wrote,
She wasn't sorry right after she did it though. She said, "It was pretty satisfying."
This is a book though. Her people read it before it was published. No one would let her say that she felt smug about it.
A person who doesn't believe that black on white hate crimes is no big deal because there isn't enough of them is more of a racist than Paula Dean and is a much more dangerous individual.
Well, I think you should have included all her thoughts when you told that story. She may have not felt bad when she did it as a little girl but as her got wiser she knew better and obviously felt badly--
I seriously doubt she felt smug. Geez...let's just hang her in the town square.
I think the DIS is full of the most judgmental people I have ever been around. They'll point fingers and say "Don't judge, don't judge" but first chance they get, they will only hear/read what they want, there is no listening and really hearing. Twist and turn things into more and worse than was said. OK, you dislike her, maybe always have disliked her--fine. But I cannot believe that anyone who reads the deposition cannot see that this is all in her past.
I'm out. I do not think any of it was right but I also understand she wasn't going around last month saying these things. It is no wonder she turned the Today Show down. People will hear and believe what they want.
She said in the book...'All these years it should have been ME sitting in that jail..." That means she knows it was wrong and feel bad for her actions. Yet, even though she said this, what she REALLY meant but her publisher would not allow her to say was "I felt smug." Give me a break!!
How old were you in 1984?
I was 6. I'm basing my opinion on speaking to people who were adults at the time and how it was covered. It came up in a conversation about this topic I had with some friends and I decided to ask around and see how it was covered at the time. The majority of people I asked about it that were adults at the time didn't even know it had happened. The few who did said it was mentioned in a blurb and that was it. No long drawn out national calls for boycotts and apologies like you see in similar situations. Michael Richards comes to mind.
That was just one example though. Contrast just two cases, the Zimmerman one and the 2007 case mentioned above, and you can see the huge difference in coverage both in amount and in tone. The race card is being thrown all around the Zimmerman case even though there is no evidence that race played any part in that night.
Like I said though, it is what it is.