Which travel option would you pick?

[tvguy]

Sorry to go but which one are you taking? I've been scouting out Pacific Coastals for a little getaway and haven't really found a great one. TIA

Celebrity Eclipse. Vancouver to Victoria. 2 days at sea. 2 days in San Francisco. Santa Barbara, ending in Los Angeles.
Our other option was on HAL. Vancouver to Honolulu, 7 sea days, no ports! And we LOVE sea days, but 7 days would have been too much. Both were $600 a person for a balcony stateroom.
Of course, spending two days in San Francisco on a ship, which is 100 miles from our home, may be odd too. But the ship docks right on Fisherman's warf, we can do the touristy stuff WITHOUT driving in San Francisco, and I absolutely HATE driving in San Francisco.

 

[Mackenzie Click-Mickelson]

Whenever reasonable I prefer non-stop.

 

[fla4fun]

The part of flying that makes me nervous is taking off and landing. I would do the non stop to only have to do that once. Plus I love road trips, so an extra hour driving wouldn’t bother me so long as it wasn’t through someplace like L.A. or Atlanta.

 

[CynBeth]

I would also do nonstop with longer drive.

 

[Mika02]

If I still have to drive I would much rather not be sitting in an airport waiting to get to my destination