Gabby Petito

I don’t know which officer is speaking in this video or if he’s one that was at the scene when Gabby and Brian were pulled over, but dispatch DID pass along the information that a witness had seen the man hitting the woman.
Yeah, that seems pretty clear. I'm really torn on this. Hindsight is always 20/20 but dang. I'm sure this will haunt her parents forever. The fact that someone saw him hitting her, the police stopped them and soon after she was dead.

My heart went out to them yesterday as they held their memorial.
 
I don’t know which officer is speaking in this video or if he’s one that was at the scene when Gabby and Brian were pulled over, but dispatch DID pass along the information that a witness had seen the man hitting the woman.
The news media is making a big deal out of this factoid -- which has been common knowledge for weeks -- because there is no new news on this story.

First there was a huge "Was critical info NOT given to the officers on the scene?" phase (despite the fact they'd known the answer since the beginning), and now it's "Wait...they DID know!" Which we've always known.

Think about it for a minute -- who was in a position to better evaluate the people involved: a passerby who saw an argument lasting a few seconds and did the right thing, or a team of officers from several departments who spent more than an hour with Gabby and Brian?

This story is clickbait, nothing more.
 
Another great story questioning the amount of coverage this story has gotten while ignoring many other cases...

Contrasting coverage of Gabby Petito case and missing and murdered Indigenous people shows ‘absolute injustice’ | The Seattle Times
I tend to take these "secondary crises" with a grain of salt, because I've seen way too many instances where the people doing the complaining have either a political or personal financial interest in using someone else's tragedy for their personal gain. That happens across the philosophical/political spectrum whenever there is a case like this -- it's certainly not limited to any particular world view.

I also don't find these complaints to be especially true here. Maybe it's because we have such a diverse population, but I don't see it here. We have a case right now in Central Florida that is getting a lot of both police investigation and media attention -- and the girl missing is apparently Hispanic and from somewhere in the Caribbean. Here's the link: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...ng-missing-college-student-last-seen-n1280175
 
The news media is making a big deal out of this factoid -- which has been common knowledge for weeks -- because there is no new news on this story.

First there was a huge "Was critical info NOT given to the officers on the scene?" phase (despite the fact they'd known the answer since the beginning), and now it's "Wait...they DID know!" Which we've always known.

Think about it for a minute -- who was in a position to better evaluate the people involved: a passerby who saw an argument lasting a few seconds and did the right thing, or a team of officers from several departments who spent more than an hour with Gabby and Brian?

This story is clickbait, nothing more.
It was the first I’d heard of the dispatch audio being released, and I knew people had been questioning what info the officers had when they arrived on the scene, so I posted it because it clears up that question.

Who’s in a better position to evaluate the people involved? One could argue that the person who witnessed him hitting her had a clearer understanding of what happened over the officers who showed up after the fact, saw nothing firsthand, and were trying to piece together the story based on what the involved parties were willing, or not willing, to say based on their own motivations. Especially when one half of the involved parties, Gabby, couldn’t even really give a coherent description of what transpired. Most of her answers boiled down to “I don’t know what happened, I just know it’s my fault.” Oddly, some of the very few things she could say confidently, that Brian corroborated himself, were, 1) he was withholding her keys to her van, 2) he got in the driver’s seat and locked her out of her van, and 3) he grabbed her face. With these facts, it’s easy to imagine a scenario where he was threatening to drive off without her, whipping her anxiety into a frenzy as was probably his goal. The witness reporting that he was slapping/hitting her should’ve further put the spotlight on Brian as the agitator. But, because the police saw a calm, friendly guy joking and laughing and a crying girl who was willing to take 100% of the blame, they gave him travel tips and a ride to a free hotel for the night and wrote her off as mentally unstable.

We know the police got it wrong, but I’m not blaming them for not recognizing her as a victim of abuse at the time. I doubt their training gives them enough expertise to properly assess mental health and/or domestic abuse cases in an hour while standing on the side of the road. A domestic violence counselor, however, would’ve seen right through this and would’ve been in a better position to talk to Gabby and set her up with resources. Instead of expecting police to sort out these types of complex situations, determine who is at fault, and issue citations/make arrests on the spot, perhaps it’d be better to shuttle the involved parties off to professionals who are better trained to understand these things and go from there.

I do think the police dropped the ball a few times. First, with the fact that they had been told the man was hitting the woman, yet they seemed to completely overlook that part by the time they were on the scene. Second, they called one of the witnesses, Christopher, while on the scene to hear his account directly. Christopher said he saw them physically engaged but couldn’t tell who was the aggressor, which the officers later used as evidence that Brian’s retelling of the incident checked out. But why didn’t the police call the other witness, the one who reported the man was hitting the woman? Would it have changed how the police handled this if the witness had insisted Brian was the aggressor? And third, they straight up missed Brian lying to them about not having a cell phone, which was his reason for why the argument escalated like it did. He literally pulled his phone out of his pocket in front of them and gave the officers his cell number after telling them he didn’t have one. :sad2:
 
Last edited:
There are lots of different ways to interpret the interaction between the police and Gabby and Brian...especially after the fact when a lovely young woman (somebody's daughter) has tragically been found dead. But that's not the same thing as being on the scene as the event happened, knowing only what the officers knew at the time.

Whether any of us here had read reports of the dispatch info given to the officers or not (I had), it is very clear that the officers DID know there was one witness who reported seeing Brian slap Gabby. There is no dispute about what the officers knew at the time.

It's always easy to critique situations like this after the fact, and our hindsight gets crystal clear when there is a tragic outcome two weeks later. There is always a nit to pick.

Cops are trained in dealing with these kinds of situations, but they are investigators, de-escalators, interveners, etc. They are not mind-readers.

Also, and this is not a trivial point, we do not KNOW whether Brian actually did anything to Gabby or not. We all have our suspicions (including me), but we don't KNOW he killed her. But those suspicions cloud our evaluation of everything we see about this case.
 
There is going to be an investigation into how that call was handled and whether the officers responded appropriately.

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/loc...gabby-petito-brian-laundrie-incident/3289182/

"We take all complaints seriously and we are committed to fully addressing these concerns. In compliance with police department policy, we will conduct an investigation. The police department will identify an unaffiliated law enforcement agency to conduct the formal investigation on our behalf," Edge said.

"Should the investigation identify areas for improvement we will take that information to heart, learn from it, and make changes if needed to ensure we are providing the best response and service to our community," he added.
 
There is going to be an investigation into how that call was handled and whether the officers responded appropriately.

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/loc...gabby-petito-brian-laundrie-incident/3289182/
I've heard this a lot locally speaking, only speaking in terms of the outcomes of the ones I can remember majority of the time no fault is found, proper procedure followed, etc. Sometimes it's not and even when it's not it doesn't mean police are faulted with an outcome that could have been avoided. Even when I talked about the difference in time between Gabby's parents last communication with her and filling a missing persons doesn't mean the outcome would have been any different (I think my only thought there was perhaps the body could have been found faster or that the disappearance of Brian something different may have happened there). Sometimes yes the police are faulted with something (though that doesn't mean criminally faulted).

The request to have an investigation shouldn't be construed that there is something wrong and it's often part of the policy once someone requests it that it's to be done.

Within the article it does say "an "outside party" filed a request asking for a formal investigation into the department's response, though didn't identify that outside party. We take all complaints seriously and we are committed to fully addressing these concerns. In compliance with police department policy, we will conduct an investigation. The police department will identify an unaffiliated law enforcement agency to conduct the formal investigation on our behalf"

I am sure though we'll all be waiting for what that investigation result is.

*Just expanding/leaping off of on your post (ETA: you've added in the quote from the article, didn't see that when I started my comment :) so that's just double in there)
 
There is going to be an investigation into how that call was handled and whether the officers responded appropriately.

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/loc...gabby-petito-brian-laundrie-incident/3289182/

"We take all complaints seriously and we are committed to fully addressing these concerns. In compliance with police department policy, we will conduct an investigation. The police department will identify an unaffiliated law enforcement agency to conduct the formal investigation on our behalf," Edge said.

"Should the investigation identify areas for improvement we will take that information to heart, learn from it, and make changes if needed to ensure we are providing the best response and service to our community," he added.
Well of course there is going to be a review of the incident! What do you expect the police department to say -- "Mind your own business???"

They wouldn't be a very good police department if they had that kind of attitude.

They'll get someone to look at it (probably some state agency, so they'll be independent), and they'll make any changes they think are appropriate. That's how you get better.
 
It was the first I’d heard of the dispatch audio being released, and I knew people had been questioning what info the officers had when they arrived on the scene, so I posted it because it clears up that question.

Who’s in a better position to evaluate the people involved? One could argue that the person who witnessed him hitting her had a clearer understanding of what happened over the officers who showed up after the fact, saw nothing firsthand, and were trying to piece together the story based on what the involved parties were willing, or not willing, to say based on their own motivations. Especially when one half of the involved parties, Gabby, couldn’t even really give a coherent description of what transpired. Most of her answers boiled down to “I don’t know what happened, I just know it’s my fault.” Oddly, some of the very few things she could say confidently, that Brian corroborated himself, were, 1) he was withholding her keys to her van, 2) he got in the driver’s seat and locked her out of her van, and 3) he grabbed her face. With these facts, it’s easy to imagine a scenario where he was threatening to drive off without her, whipping her anxiety into a frenzy as was probably his goal. The witness reporting that he was slapping/hitting her should’ve further put the spotlight on Brian as the agitator. But, because the police saw a calm, friendly guy joking and laughing and a crying girl who was willing to take 100% of the blame, they gave him travel tips and a ride to a free hotel for the night and wrote her off as mentally unstable.

We know the police got it wrong, but I’m not blaming them for not recognizing her as a victim of abuse at the time. I doubt their training gives them enough expertise to properly access mental health and/or domestic abuse cases in an hour while standing on the side of the road. A domestic violence counselor, however, would’ve seen right through this and would’ve been in a better position to talk to Gabby and set her up with resources. Instead of expecting police to sort out these types of complex situations, determine who is at fault, and issue citations/make arrests on the spot, perhaps it’d be better to shuttle the involved parties off to professionals who are better trained to understand these things and go from there.

I do think the police dropped the ball a few times. First, with the fact that they had been told the man was hitting the woman, yet they seemed to completely overlook that part by the time they were on the scene. Second, they called one of the witnesses, Christopher, while on the scene to hear his account directly. Christopher said he saw them physically engaged but couldn’t tell who was the aggressor, which the officers later used as evidence that Brian’s retelling of the incident checked out. But why didn’t the police call the other witness, the one who reported the man was hitting the woman? Would it have changed how the police handled this if the witness had insisted Brian was the aggressor? And third, they straight up missed Brian lying to them about not having a cell phone, which was his reason for why the argument escalated like it did. He literally pulled his phone out of his pocket in front of them and gave the officers his cell number after telling them he didn’t have one. :sad2:
To the bolded. Moab police have said there was only one witness - Christopher. I posted information about this (but not sure exactly where it is at this point, buried somewhere in this thread).
 
Well of course there is going to be a review of the incident! What do you expect the police department to say -- "Mind your own business???"

They wouldn't be a very good police department if they had that kind of attitude.

They'll get someone to look at it (probably some state agency, so they'll be independent), and they'll make any changes they think are appropriate. That's how you get better.
Of course.

In this case it was requested by an outside party, who they won’t name. (According to the article I posted.)
 
Instead of expecting police to sort out these types of complex situations, determine who is at fault, and issue citations/make arrests on the spot, perhaps it’d be better to shuttle the involved parties off to professionals who are better trained to understand these things and go from there.

What you've described is a seizure, also known as an arrest. Police must have probable cause to arrest. Police can also detain people while they investigate and the courts have ruled that what amounts to reasonable detention is dependent on the facts and circumstances - i.e. you can detain someone for hours during a murder investigation but probably not for a DV incident that did not result in injury.

I'm all for asking highly skilled professionals to assist police in certain types of cases, but you'd need to have a team ready and available to be deployed right then and there as police can only detain for so long. My city is trying to send mental health professionals to certain calls rather than the police and what happens most of the time is 1) no one is available or 2) they won't go without the police first clearing the location for safety.
 
What you've described is a seizure, also known as an arrest. Police must have probable cause to arrest. Police can also detain people while they investigate and the courts have ruled that what amounts to reasonable detention is dependent on the facts and circumstances - i.e. you can detain someone for hours during a murder investigation but probably not for a DV incident that did not result in injury.

I'm all for asking highly skilled professionals to assist police in certain types of cases, but you'd need to have a team ready and available to be deployed right then and there as police can only detain for so long. My city is trying to send mental health professionals to certain calls rather than the police and what happens most of the time is 1) no one is available or 2) they won't go without the police first clearing the location for safety.
If I recall, you are an attorney, correct?
 
There are lots of different ways to interpret the interaction between the police and Gabby and Brian...especially after the fact when a lovely young woman (somebody's daughter) has tragically been found dead. But that's not the same thing as being on the scene as the event happened, knowing only what the officers knew at the time.

Whether any of us here had read reports of the dispatch info given to the officers or not (I had), it is very clear that the officers DID know there was one witness who reported seeing Brian slap Gabby. There is no dispute about what the officers knew at the time.

It's always easy to critique situations like this after the fact, and our hindsight gets crystal clear when there is a tragic outcome two weeks later. There is always a nit to pick.

Cops are trained in dealing with these kinds of situations, but they are investigators, de-escalators, interveners, etc. They are not mind-readers.

Also, and this is not a trivial point, we do not KNOW whether Brian actually did anything to Gabby or not. We all have our suspicions (including me), but we don't KNOW he killed her. But those suspicions cloud our evaluation of everything we see about this case.
I know hindsight is 20/20 and also that it’s easy to make a mistake or have something slip by you in the moment, which is why I said I don’t blame the police in this situation even though they were wrong about who was ultimately the bigger victim in this relationship. And you’re right, police are trained to intervene, de-escalate, and investigate. They are not trained to assess mental health and domestic violence issues the way a professional in those fields would be, which is why it would be better if the handling of these situations — in regards to who’s at fault, what should be done in the short term, and recommendations and providing resources for the long term — were left up to someone more specialized in these areas.

If the officers DID know a witness had reported seeing Brian hit Gabby, why didn’t they address that on the scene? Why didn’t they follow up with that second witness like they did Chris?

To the bolded. Moab police have said there was only one witness - Christopher. I posted information about this (but not sure exactly where it is at this point, buried somewhere in this thread).
The first couple articles that came up when I went to double check indicate there were two witnesses that contacted police in Moab.

“Earlier this month, Moab Police shared the audio of the initial call made to 911 in which a man tells dispatchers he saw Laundrie slapping Petito outside a grocery store in August. The man was not the only one to see the incident take place. According to a statement form filed with the Moab Police Department obtained by ABC4 affiliate NewsNation, another individual saw what happened and believed it ‘didn’t seem right.’ …The man says he saw someone else calling police about the incident and opted instead to leave his contact information with law enforcement.”

https://www.abc4.com/news/gabby-pet...-details-of-petito-laundrie-incident-in-utah/
“Chris “noticed another person had called this in,” he wrote, so as he left Moonflower, he gave his contact info to a police officer he spotted nearby.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/witne...couple-gabby-petito-and-brian-laundries-fight
What you've described is a seizure, also known as an arrest. Police must have probable cause to arrest. Police can also detain people while they investigate and the courts have ruled that what amounts to reasonable detention is dependent on the facts and circumstances - i.e. you can detain someone for hours during a murder investigation but probably not for a DV incident that did not result in injury.

I'm all for asking highly skilled professionals to assist police in certain types of cases, but you'd need to have a team ready and available to be deployed right then and there as police can only detain for so long. My city is trying to send mental health professionals to certain calls rather than the police and what happens most of the time is 1) no one is available or 2) they won't go without the police first clearing the location for safety.
Oh, but it did result in injury. The police took photos of Brian’s injuries on the scene.
 
Last edited:
What you've described is a seizure, also known as an arrest. Police must have probable cause to arrest. Police can also detain people while they investigate and the courts have ruled that what amounts to reasonable detention is dependent on the facts and circumstances - i.e. you can detain someone for hours during a murder investigation but probably not for a DV incident that did not result in injury.
Yes!

This is the kind of thing that frustrates police (and I'm sure prosecutors). Whenever there is a viral incident like this, all the "woulda-done, coulda-done, shoulda-dones" come out later with penetrating critiques of the best possible things that were not done.

But there are several inconveniences that restrict police ability to do certain things. One of them is the US Constitution, and others are hundreds of local and state laws with establish not only what is a crime, but what evidence is permissible in court and how it must be handled, as well as the arrest and following prosecution steps.

And thank goodness we HAVE those vital protections! Also thank goodness that any law enforcement officer's FIRST duty is to respect those constraints on the power with which we are entrusted.

The laws also vary widely from state to state -- and Florida has both good and bad examples. For example:
  • Baker Act-- in Florida, police have the authority to take a person into custody if there is a reasonable belief that the person has some kind of mental issue that makes them a danger to themselves or others. In Baker Act detentions, the person is transported to a licensed mental health facility for evaluation. The facility can detain them up to 3 days (unless the law has changed) to determine if they need to be kept out of trouble. Families and other interested parties can also go to court and seek a judicial order (called an ex parte order) which directs the police to go get the person and take them for evaluation.
    • Having watched the hour-long body cam video of the police interaction with Gabby and Brian, I don't think either one met the standard required for involuntary commitment -- in FLORIDA. I know nothing about Utah law.
  • Domestic violence statute -- in Florida, at one time we had a statute that REQUIREDpolice officers to arrest a subject in a domestic dispute if there was a) an allegation of violence, and b) anyevidence of physical injury. Every time, no exceptions, no consideration of any other factors.
    • I hated that law, and finally the Legislature changed it to a more rational approach. Now all allegations have to be documented, appropriate medical care must be rendered, the victim must be advised of all protections available to them, and if there are any injuries noted the officer must document why they did not arrest the person who caused the injury.
 
Last edited:
I know hindsight is 20/20 and also that it’s easy to make a mistake or have something slip by you in the moment, which is why I said I don’t blame the police in this situation even though they were wrong about who was ultimately the bigger victim in this relationship.
I'm not psychic, so I don't know who was the bigger aggressor or the most victimized person. I can't draw any conclusions like that from a one-hour video. All I know is that Gabby is dead. I don't know how she died, and neither does anyone else here.
If the officers DID know a witness had reported seeing Brian hit Gabby, why didn’t they address that on the scene?
There is NO IF. They knew -- they were very clearly told that by the dispatcher in the audio recordings that have been released.

Also, there are ways to determine what happened besides asking direct questions. Those officers did a very thorough job of figuring out what happened and what steps to take next. You are micro-focused on one comment made by a witness based on a momentary observation of an argument he drove past. You have to look at the entire picture.
Why didn’t they follow up with that second witness like they did Chris?
Again, I personally don't know if there were two witness calls to 911 or only the one. I've seen news reports both ways, and both news reports and eyewitness reports are notoriously inaccurate.
 
I'm not psychic, so I don't know who was the bigger aggressor or the most victimized person. I can't draw any conclusions like that from a one-hour video. All I know is that Gabby is dead. I don't know how she died, and neither does anyone else here. There is NO IF. They knew -- they were very clearly told that by the dispatcher in the audio recordings that have been released.

Also, there are ways to determine what happened besides asking direct questions. Those officers did a very thorough job of figuring out what happened and what steps to take next. You are micro-focused on one comment made by a witness based on a momentary observation of an argument he drove past. You have to look at the entire picture.Again, I personally don't know if there were two witness calls to 911 or only the one. I've seen news reports both ways, and both news reports and eyewitness reports are notoriously inaccurate.
I know all the facts aren’t in yet, but at this point I feel pretty comfortable saying the one who ended up dead was probably the bigger victim in that tumultuous relationship.

I’m not “micro-focused on one comment made by a witness.” I’ve been discussing many aspects of this case throughout this thread and as the conversation has drifted to the police handling of the Aug. 12 incident, that’s what I’m currently discussing, as are others, you included.

You mentioned how state laws vary upthread. The officers spent a significant amount of time in that video talking about what Utah law (they were in Utah, not New Mexico) required of them. They were very clear that they had no discretion in cases of domestic assault and because Brian and Gabby lived together and Brian had visible injuries, they met the criteria for domestic assault. They expressly said multiple times that they had no choice but to charge Gabby. Towards the end of the video, three of the officers stood around deliberating about whether to charge her, then one of the officers went to Gabby and told her he’d decided not to charge her with domestic assault. 🤷🏻‍♀️ But supposedly Utah law doesn’t allow them discretion not to charge someone under the circumstances.

There were two witnesses. One called 911, the other known as Chris physically walked up to a police officer and told him what he had seen and gave the officer his contact information. Later, he wrote a statement. Chris is the witness the officer called while at the traffic stop. The officer never called the second witness, but he did talk about there being two witnesses in the video:

“Both an independent witness, probably the next one we’re going to talk to as well, which we haven’t talked to yet, but one we did talk to, and your own companion have made it clear that she was the primary aggressor.”

He was *guessing* as to what the second witness would say if they contacted him.

So yeah, I don’t expect policing to be perfect, but I think there are a few things in this scenario that should raise some questions.

ETA: I’m just realizing in that officer’s quote above he said the witness “made it clear that she (Gabby) was the primary aggressor.” Except, that’s not at all what the witness said in the written statement or on the phone call with the officer at the time. If you watch the video, the officer says the witness couldn’t tell if Brian pushed Gabby in defense or because he was the aggressor. In the next breath, the officer was calling Gabby the primary aggressor. It’s like a one-man-version of a bad game of telephone.
 
Last edited:
The first couple articles that came up when I went to double check indicate there were two witnesses that contacted police in Moab.

“Earlier this month, Moab Police shared the audio of the initial call made to 911 in which a man tells dispatchers he saw Laundrie slapping Petito outside a grocery store in August. The man was not the only one to see the incident take place. According to a statement form filed with the Moab Police Department obtained by ABC4 affiliate NewsNation, another individual saw what happened and believed it ‘didn’t seem right.’ …The man says he saw someone else calling police about the incident and opted instead to leave his contact information with law enforcement.”

https://www.abc4.com/news/gabby-pet...-details-of-petito-laundrie-incident-in-utah/
“Chris “noticed another person had called this in,” he wrote, so as he left Moonflower, he gave his contact info to a police officer he spotted nearby.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/witne...couple-gabby-petito-and-brian-laundries-fight
This was discussed on and around page 30 here.

Someone posted an article in post #582 from Fox News that said this:

“Christopher’s statement also reports that he "noticed another person had called this in." Authorities told Fox News that they had no record of a second call.

The article:

Details of Utah’s Gabby Petito‘s Utah Fight With Fiancé Brian Laundrie Revealed In Witness Statement To Police

Christopher wrote the witness statement.

There has been a lot of conflicting information from news organizations. I’m just saying that, that according to this article, according to “authorities”, there was no second witness.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top